Monday, October 1, 2012

MAHARASHTRA IRRIGATION SCAM: BJP MP’s co got 1,350cr dam deals illegally

Firm Was Also Given Advances Against Rules
Mumbai: A non-existing company owned by BJP Rajya Sabha MP Ajay Sancheti bagged irrigation projects worth Rs 1,350 crore in Maharashtra in 2007-08.

The firm, Shakti Kumar M Sancheti Ltd, was renamed SMS Infrastructure in November 2005. Yet, Sancheti was awarded contracts by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) under the name of the old company. “Once the name of a company is changed, the old name ceases to exist and the new name comes into existence. The Sancheti group used the old name as well as the new
name concurrently to obtain more contracts than permitted,’’ said officials. Government sources said VIDC’s norms permitted a maximum of three contracts to a single contractor. Its tender condition clearly stipulated that in case of violation, the contractor would be blacklisted.

Sancheti is a close aide of BJP president Nitin Gadkari and his family has RSS links for the last three generations. His uncle, Chainsukh Sancheti, is the BJP MLA from Buldhana district.

Documents accessed by TOI reveal that the now defunct firm (Shakti Kumar) went on to bag four contracts; two in Gosikhurd in Bhandara district, one in Amravati district and another in Yavatmal district collectively worth Rs 1,350 crore. (VIDC later cancelled one of the tenders because it was awarded at an exorbitant rate.)

Simultaneously, SMS Infrastructure also procured projects worth an additional Rs 389 crore between 2006 and 2009.

Sancheti was not available for comment despite several attempt.

TOI BLEW LID OFF IRRIGATION SCAM

In a series of reports starting April 25, TOI exposed the politician-official-contractor nexus in irrigation projects that is bleeding the state dry. Last Tuesday, deputy chief minister and former water resources minister Ajit Pawar resigned over the allegations. On Sunday, in his first public appearance after quitting the government, he claimed in Akola that he was the victim of a conspiracy to malign him and that it was a tactic to deflect attention from the Coalgate controversy.

Advance paid as ‘special case’ to Sancheti firms

Mumbai: Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation’s (VIDC) benevolence towards BJP MP Ajay Sancheti went beyond giving illegal contracts to his company. The contractor received a mobilization advance of Rs 121 crore despite various government circulars which prohibited such advances. These circulars were later scrapped by the then water resources minister Ajit Pawar in 2008.

Interestingly, resolutions signed by Pawar and VIDC executive director D P Shirke stated that the advance was paid to Sancheti’s two firms as a special case. Strangely, the resolution also said that there was no provision in the tender for such advance payment. These resolutions were not signed by the secretary of water resources department, who is the ex-officio managing director of VIDC.

TOI has also learned that in 2010, the VIDC’s governing council stayed the rule granting three works per contractor. In March, the central water commission chairman, R C Jha, visited the Gosikhurd project and observed that the right bank main canal being executed by Sancheti had either collapsed or tilted by nine metres at various spots. But VIDC engineers defended the work, stating that this was due to geological conditions. Sancheti’s SMS Infrastructure claims to be one of the largest infrastructure companies in Central India with an employee base of over 1,300 people and a turnover of around Rs 1,100 crore.

MPS PROTEST 250% DAM COST HIKE

In November 2011, two MPs wrote to Union water resources minister Pawan Kumar Bansal about the unusual increase in the cost of the Purna barrage-2 (Ner Dhamana) irrigation project.

The work was awarded to Sancheti. BJP’s Haribhau Jawale and Shiv Sena’s Nandrao Adul complained that its cost had shot up from 182 crore to 638 crore.

“The design finalization was done way ahead after the tender was awarded. This resulted in excess expenditure by more than three times,’’ said Jawale’s letter.

He further said that the original 2008 administrative approval was obtained without following due procedure. “If tender had been awarded post-finalization of design, it would have saved a lot of money and resources.

As a result, cost of irrigating the land is estimated at 9.19 lakh a hectare whereas the normal cost is around 2 lakh a hectare,’’ he added.

The Centre had imposed a condition that the project be completed within the sanctioned amount. “However, reality seems to be far different as the project cost is revised drastically.

Definitely, there seems to major manipulation causing undue benefit to certain vested interests,’’ said Jawale. He urged the minister not to sanction the revised estimate as it was an “unrealistic’’ one.

COURTECY:
Nauzer K Bharucha TNN
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2012/10/01&PageLabel=1&EntityId=Ar00100&ViewMode=HTML

1 comment:

  1. Your approach to this topic is unique and informative. I am writing an article for our school paper and this post has helped me. Thanks.

    pu synthetic leather trader in india

    ReplyDelete