Showing posts with label robert Vadra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robert Vadra. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Political Business Tree that Gives and...


Companies run by family members of some politicians are like every other company. And they are not, as these four practices that run through their businesses and have aided their meteoric rise show. John Samuel Raja D reports

Talk about business growth and opportunity. In the last five years, Theon Pharmaceuticals, controlled by the immediate family of former railways minister Pawan Kumar Bansal, has increased in size from 15 crore to 152 crore.

Elsewhere, in the same period, 757 crore of cash has come into seven companies owned by Anand Kumar, the brother of former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Mayawati. Robert Vadra, the son-in-law of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, has quietly assembled a real estate business estimated in the region of about 300 crore.

And YS Jaganmohan Reddy, son of the late Andhra Pradesh Congress leader YSR Reddy, has seen his wealth increase six-fold, to 446 crore, in the space of just two years. These are growth rates that would make even a blue-blooded corporate go green with envy. In times that have been tough and trying, these four blueblooded family members of politicians in power have built businesses from scratch. These companies are like every other company. And they are not, as these four business practices, which have aided their meteoric rise, show.

THEY HAVE BEEN SELLING SHARES AT BIG PREMIUMS 
Robert Vadra aside, the others have been selling shares in their fledgling companies to outside investors at a premium—usually hefty—even as the promoters themselves subscribe at par value. Thus, the promoters are able to pump cash from external sources into the company without diluting their equity stake much. The most recent case is that of a company promoted by the family members of Pawan Kumar Bansal, the former railways minister who resigned earlier this month following corruption charges against one of his nephews. Company filings with the Ministry of Company Affairs (MCA) show that in March 2011, the board of Mirage Infra passed a resolution to issue 4,000 shares to a non-promoter shareholder, Rajeev Garg, at a premium of 990 per share, which brought in 40 lakh into the company. However, a year later, in March 2012, the Mirage board approved the issuance of 46,000 shares at their par value of 10 each to three family members of Bansal’s extended family. Pawan Kumar Bansal declined to respond to a questionnaire sent to his office. Similarly, companies owned by Anand Kumar, Mayawati’s brother, have received huge capital infusions by issuing shares to outside investors. ET was the first to report this, in January 2013.

For example, DLA Infrastructure, which had a net profit of 2.2 crore in 2009-10, garnered 100 crore by selling its shares at a premium. Another company, Dia Realtors, with a net profit of 4.5 crore in 2011-12, collected 71 crore. The sale of shares at a premium is one of the ways in which 757 crore of cash came into seven companies owned by the 37-year-old Kumar when Mayawati was the chief minister of UP between 2007 and 2012. MCA filings show that another 346 crore came from the sale of investments (which were not disclosed) and 12.7 crore from advances received from third-parties that were forfeited. ET could not reach Ambeth Rajan, who handles media queries for Anand Kumar, on his mobile or landline numbers. The issuance of shares at hefty premiums forms a central part of the disproportionate assets case made out by India’s premier investigating agency against YS Jaganmohan Reddy. In one of the charge-sheets against Jagan Reddy, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) describes these “investments as part of quid pro quo arrangement for the largesse and the benefit obtained by the investors”. Jagan Reddy, while filing his nomination papers for the 2011 Lok Sabha elections, disclosed that his personal wealth had shot up six-fold in two years, from 73 crore to 446 crore. The filings showed that three-fourth of his wealth was derived from share ownership, in particular in Bharathi Cement Corporation, a company in which he held majority shareholding for a few years. MCA filings by Bharathi Cement for the last six years show that eight outside investors, including Dalmia Cement (Bharat) and India Cements, bought shares at a huge premium, while Jagan Reddy and his family members subscribed to the same at par.

As per calculations done by ET, these eight investors invested at least 142 crore by subscribing to 0% preference shares, paying between 90 and 1,440 per share, between April 2007 and March 2008. Two months before external investors started investing, Jagan Reddy picked up 30 million shares at 10 per share, paying 30 crore. As a result of these transactions, Jagan, along with his relations, held near 100% of Bharathi Cement, while outside investors —who brought in at least 4.5 times more than Jagan Reddy —have no stake as their preference shares have no voting rights. “By the time outside investors came in to invest in Bharathi Cement, the promoters had already done a lot of work and invested a lot into the company,” argues Madhulika Chavva Reddy, spokesperson for YSR Congress Party, which is headed by Jagan Reddy. “The project already had all the permissions along with the entire land, what is private land was also procured from farmers, loans were sanctioned and the project was in the construction stage. Moreover, the investors who came in were only investors, they did not sign any corporate guarantees to the bank. The rest was totally Mr Jagan’s.”

The CBI, in its chargesheet, has alleged that a similar transaction took place in Jagati Publications Pvt Ltd, which runs the print operations of the Sakshi Group, owned by Jagan Reddy. Its chargesheet says that outside investors invested 1,246 crore over two years in Jagati, at 350 per share, and benefited from the decisions taken by the Andhra Pradesh government when his father was at its helm. “There are no complaints that Mr Jagan has either siphoned or misappropriated the premium amount in the companies,” says Madhulika Chavva Reddy.

THEY ARE INCLINED TOWARDS REAL ESTATE 
Real estate seems to be the most popular business area, with Vadra, the extended Bansal family and Anand Kumar all expanding their presence in the sector at a brisk pace. In the last five years, for example, Vadra has been buying—and sometimes selling —land, and has also diversified into building housing projects, and in developing and managing hotels. ET was the first to report this, in March 2011. An October 2012 article in the Economic & Political Weekly, titled ‘Where Do Indian Billionaires Get Their Wealth?’, pointed out that the primary source of wealth of 20 of 46 India’s billionaires in 2012, as listed by Forbes magazine, was ‘rent-thick’ sectors. This paper by Aditi Gandhi of the Centre for Policy Research and Michael Walton of Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, termed seven sectors —real estate, construction, infrastructure, ports, media, cement and mining —as “rent thick because of the pervasive role of the state in giving licences, reputations of illegality, or information on monopolistic practices”. In October 2012, Arvind Kejriwal, founder of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), had alleged that DLF, the country’s largest real estate developer, had given companies owned by Vadra an interest-free loan of 65 crore and heavy bargains on land in exchange for political favours. Refuting those allegations, DLF had said then that these were not loans, but advances to buy land in Manesar and Faridabad. Subsequently, in one transaction, a Vadra company bought 3.53 acres of land from farmers for 7.5 crore in February 2008. In less than four months, it obtained a licence to change the land use to build residential houses, and sold the land to DLF for 58 crore. Vadra did not reply to an email questionnaire sent to Vadra’s personal secretary, Manoj Arora, on May 16.

THEY HAVE DEALINGS WITH BIG COMPANIES 
This transaction is not the only one between these fledgling companies, trying to find their feet in business, and established companies. DLF also gave Vadra a 50% stake for 35 crore in its hotel joint venture in October 2009, and has since done three transactions worth 446 crore with it. Similarly, two close associates of Anand Kumar had links to a business group, Carnoustie Management, in which DLF and Unitech invested 6 crore and 335 crore, respectively, between 2010 and 2012. Both DLF and Unitech have said these investments were part of their normal business transactions. Even Theon Pharmacenticals, which does contract manufacturing from its plant in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, counts Ranbaxy, Cipla, Piramal, Mankind and Torrent as its clients in its MCA filings. Theon is owned by Bansal’s wife, Madhu, and their two sons, Amit and Manish. The company has seen its turnover rocket from 15 crore in 2007-08 to 152 crore in 2011-12.

THEY HAVE RECEIVED LOANS ON GENEROUS TERMS 
One factor in Theon’s meteoric rise — which began soon after Bansal’s first appointment in the UPA government in January 2006 —is the availability of funding. Theon secured a loan of 60 crore from Canara Bank in 2007, when Bansal was the minister of state for finance in the UPA-I government in charge of banking and insurance. The BJP has alleged the loans were extended to Theon after Bansal cleared the appointment of Sunil Kumar Gupta, a chartered accountant who was the auditor to several companies owned by the Bansal clan, as a director in Canara Bank. The bank also loaned 40 crore to Mirage Infra, a company in which Bansal’s nephew Vijay Singla is a director, in 2008 despite it not having any running business. Gupta told The Times of India that he had limited powers to sanction any loan for the companies. “First, I was a non-official director and then a shareholder director. These profiles have limited powers. As far as conflict of interest is concerned, my wife and I are not at least auditing the same firm. The question must be asked to the promoters why they were interested in making us directors,” he said.
COURTESY:
john.raja@timesgroup.com 
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=ETNEW&BaseHref=ETM/2013/05/21&PageLabel=22&EntityId=Ar02200&ViewMode=HTML

Haryana refuses to give Vadra deal docus to Khemka

Chandigarh: The Haryana government seems adamant on not providing any documents related to the land deal between UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra and DLF to whistleblower IAS officer Ashok Khemka. Khemka had cancelled the mutation of the deal on October 15, 2012.

In a recent letter to state chief secretary P K Chaudhery, Khemka said, “no department has provided any of the requested information so far”. The government had on March 1 asked Khemka to submit his comments on a probe report by a three-member panel on his orders cancelling the Vadra land deal’s mutation.

Following this, Khemka had sought documents from revenue, town and country planning, industries and commerce departments but the government did not provide any documents to the officer. “It’s like asking someone to run a 100-metre dash with his hands tied. My morale is high and I will run the race despite that,” Khemka told TOI.

Khemka, as director general of land consolidation department in 2012, had cancelled the mutation just three days after he asked deputy commissioners of four districts to inspect all documents related to land deals registered on behalf of Vadra or his companies.

The government’s inquiry committee had indicted Khemka for passing “hasty orders without due legal examination of the background of the case”. However,Khemka termed the report as “an attempt to defend the land licensing transaction of the companies owned by Vadra”.
Courtesy:
Sukhbir Siwach TNN
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2013/04/25&PageLabel=11&EntityId=Ar01104&ViewMode=HTML

Sunday, April 7, 2013

VADRA WAS USED AS A SHIELD FOR OTHER LAND DEALS: Ashok Khemka

Haryana IAS officer Ashok Khemka made headlines after he cancelled the mutation of a land deal between UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra and real estate giant DLF in October last year. He was then shifted to the Haryana Seed Development Corporation where as MD he exposed a multi-crore fungicide purchase scam recently. On Thursday, he was transferred for the 44th time to the Haryana archives department. Khemka spoke exclusively to Sukhbir Siwach on the possible motives behind his latest transfer.

+ Do you think Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda transferred you at the behest of Robert Vadra?
= Well, I don’ know what made the CM issue this transfer order just five months after my last transfer. After exposing the land licensing scam, I had been transferred to Haryana Seed Development Corporation as its managing director, a very junior level assignment. Why another transfer? Also, it was executed in a very humiliating manner. Even before I got the order, the officer succeeding me came to my office at 3.30pm on Thursday and told me that I should vacate the office so that he can join. He joined without my relieving charge. I asked him to wait for my transfer order to come but the (chief secretary’s) office informed me that I should download the order from the net and relinquish office. I was forced out four hours before the transfer order was actually delivered at my residence. This kind of humiliation will be very, very damaging to the morale of upright public servants.

Also, why did the principal secretary (agriculture) issue orders appointing a junior officer as MD of the corporation? Before this, this post has been held by an IAS officer and the appointment orders issued by the office of chief secretary.

+ Do you think you will keep on being a victim just because you blew the whistle on son-inlaw of Sonia Gandhi?
= Well, I cannot foretell the future but yes, I will continue to do my duty whether it is Mr Robert Vadra who is hit or X, Y, Z. This is not about whistle-blowing, it is about doing your duty. Everyone howsoever high, including the CM, is under the rule of law.

+ Do you think this is a fallout of your move to cancel the mutation of Vadra-DLF land deal during your posting in the land consolidation department?
= Well it could be. That (Vadra-DLF case) became a high profile case in the media. But Vadra was just one case. There was a big politico-bureaucratic nexus and Vadra was probably used as a shield for others. And it acted as a beautiful shield. Today, nobody is questioning the bureaucrats and politicians who misused consolidation proceedings. A glaring example was a case in which a gram panchayat was cheated of 20 acres of prime Gurgaon land. It was restored to it by Punjab and Haryana high court on the basis of an additional statement filed by me, and that too without the government’s approval. I was specifically prohibited by the government from filing it without approval but the approval was not forthcoming. And had that written statement not been filed, the entire scam of misappropriating panchayat land would have been brushed under the carpet. So it was not just Vadra. I think the nexus beautifully used this case to camouflage their own actions.

+ Haryana CM has said that transfer of Khemka is not a big deal. Would you like to comment on it?
= I don’t want to comment on comments. It is the opinion of chief minister and I respect it. But all the weapons in their armoury were used against me, including abusing and threatening me. And, for what? Wasn’t it the late PM Rajiv Gandhi who stated that only Rs 15 out of Rs 100 reached the masses? In my corporation (HSDC) even Rs 15 was not reaching them. I was trying to ensure that the subsidy amount goes directly to the bank account of farmers. Exposing the misappropriation of subsidies and filing cases with the CBI was a duty required of me. To let those implicated in the FIR remain and remove me is g reatly disappointing.

+ Do you plan to go to the CAT against the latest transfer order?
= No. I would respect the decision of the state government. I will use this opportunity to find modern ways to c o n s e r ve t h e material in the archives.
Courtesy:
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2013/04/07&PageLabel=26&EntityId=Ar02600&ViewMode=HTML

Saturday, October 6, 2012

DLF gave Vadra 500 crore property cheap: Kejriwal

Cong Rubbishes Charge, Says It’s Politically Driven


New Delhi: India Against Corruption (IAC) activists Prashant Bhushan and Arvind Kejriwal on Friday alleged that realty giant DLF gave properties, currently valued at around Rs 500 crore, to Sonia Gandhi’s son-inlaw Robert Vadra at grossly undervalued rates in exchange for favours it allegedly received from Congress state governments in Haryana, Rajasthan and Delhi.

The allegations attracted a sharp response from Congress leaders who accused the activists of “blackmail” and claimed they were violating the basic principles of decency. The leaders sought to downplay these allegations, saying they were based on papers that have been in the public domain. They spoke of “teaching a lesson” to “irresponsible” activists.

Bhushan and Kejriwal, who launched a political party on Monday, told a crowded press conference here that five companies promoted by Robert Vadra and his mother, Maureen Vadra, with a combined share capital of Rs 50 lakh, and with no obvious revenue stream, acquired at least 31 properties in the three states between 2007 and 2010 after getting an unsecured, interest-free loan of Rs 65 crore from DLF. Priyanka Gandhi was also initially a director in the companies, but quit soon, they said.

They claimed the Vadras acquired all the properties—the 114-room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel in South Delhi, a penthouse in DLF Aralias and 7 flats in DLF Magnolia in Gurgaon, an apartment in Capital Greens, a plot in Greater Kailash-II and 20 plots of land spread over Haryana and Rajasthan.

 

THE ALLEGATIONS


5 companies owned by Robert Vadra and his mother Maureen bought 31 properties in 2007-10
These include 50% share in Hilton Hotel in Saket, Delhi for 31.7cr (current price said to be 150cr or more), 10,000 sq ft flat in DLF Aralias, Gurgaon, for 89 lakh (current price said to be 25cr), 7 flats in DLF Magnolia, Gurgaon, for 5.2cr (currently valued at over 100cr)

Balance sheets show these 5 firms had a total share capital of 50 lakh. Value of these properties on books was 69.64cr. Firms had no obvious revenue stream. Seed money for acquisitions came from unsecured, interest-free loan of over 65cr from DLF

Kejriwal and Bhushan claim that the worth of the properties when bought was 300cr; now over 500cr

THE DEFENCE


This is blackmail…We will explore all options to teach these people a lesson. Everything was in the public domain. Don’t allow these people to destroy the fabric of decency — Salman Khurshid
A private citizen is only being targeted because of his relationship to Sonia Gandhi. This is below the belt —Jayanthi Natarajan

These transactions were done in conformity with the highest standards of ethics —DLF Documents from registrar of companies, says Bhushan

The activists distributed documents to buttress their claim that Robert and Maureen Vadra paid relatively small amounts for the properties. For instance, they paid Rs 32 crore for a 50% stake in Hilton Hotel, Saket, which they valued to be worth anything between Rs 150 and Rs 300 crore. For the DLF Aralias penthouse, allegedly worth in the region of Rs 25-40 crore, they paid Rs 89 lakh.

“Why would DLF first give an unsecured interestfree loan to Vadras and then sell its properties at throwaway prices to them?” wondered Bhushan.

The reaction of the Congress was ferocious, with the party scrambling to wheel out its heavy artillery. A battery of Union ministers, including I&B minister Ambika Soni, law minister Salman Khurshid, environment minister Jayanthi Natarajan and minister of state for parliamentary affairs Rajiv Shukla, along with party spokespersons, came out to defend Vadra. They dubbed the allegations mischievous and motivated, questioned the competence of the activists to level charges and suggested that the timing of the allegation was chosen to hurt the Congress in the Gujarat elections.

The Haryana and Delhi governments promptly denied any wrongdoings. Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda said, “We did not give any concession to anyone. We did not allot even a single inch of land to anyone. I had asked officials to do everything in a transparent manner and in the interest of the state.” DLF, too, came out with a statement to stress that the transactions were in accordance with the “highest standards of ethics”.

Citing favours that the DLF has received from Congress governments, Bhushan and Kejriwal pointed out that the DLF Magnolia complex was built on 350 acres of land in Gurgaon which was acquired by the Congress’s Haryana government for “public purpose” but was transferred to the real estate company. “Villagers from whom the land was taken were told that the acquisition was for setting up an industry,” they said.

When asked how the allegations concerned the Congress, Prashant Bhushan said, “The land acquisition has been done in Delhi, Rajasthan and Haryana…all led by Congress governments…and we know who the leader of the Congress is.” He also promised to make more disclosures on the matter, stressing that the documents he has submitted were from the Registrar of Companies.

Demanding an independent investigation into the sources of funding, Bhushan and Kejriwal said the whole business smacked of a quid pro quo. They said that only an independent probe would serve the purpose as none of the government agencies, the CBI or the Income Tax department, could probe Vadra, whom they described as the “sarkari damad”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Vadra TO ECONOMIC TIMES ON MARCH 14, 2011


I HAVE KNOWN HE DLF PEOPLE FOR A LONG TIME AND THEY ARE FRIENDS OF MINE. I HAD WANTED TO INVEST IN REAL ESTATE AND ONE THING LED TO ANOTHER.

COURTECY
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2012/10/06&PageLabel=1&EntityId=Ar00101&ViewMode=HTML