Showing posts with label fsi scam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fsi scam. Show all posts

Friday, June 21, 2013

FSI SCAM: Tardeo bldg in dock over flats built in refuge areas

Mumbai: The BMC has reported a host of irregularities in Willingdon Heights,a34-storey tower at Tardeo’s Tulsiwadi, where apartments cost around Rs 5 crore.

Refuge floors meant for fire-fighting have been converted into flats, stilt parking used as habitable area and several flats amalgamated by demolishing walls, the Bombay high court has been told in an ongoing battle between the residents, the builder, civic authorities and BEST.

Last year, when the high court passed an interim order, directing these refuge areas to be cleared, the builder, Satellite Holdings, said it was not aware that the 16th, 24th and 31st floors were marked as refuge areas by the BMC. The developer said it would ask the BMC to regularize these areas if it was permitted to build six more floors with the balance floor space index (FSI) that it claims to possess.

If the BMC allows this construction, the builder said it would relocate people occupying flats on the refuge floors. “This is the proposal which the applicant has to regularize the entire irregularity,” said a notice of motion filed by Satellite. A senior civic official said no rules allow such irregularities to be condoned and the builder’s claim of additional FSI will have to be verified. The court will hear the matter later this month.

‘Tardeo building flouted norms’

Mumbai: The BMC has carried out an inspection of the posh 34-storey Willingdon Heights in Tardeo’s Tulsiwadi and reported a slew of violations, non-compliance and work carried out beyond approved plans by the builder.

The stilt parking area had been found covered with glazed partitions. On the first floor, the greater height stilt portion was covered with RCC slab while the meter room, telephone room and society room were converted into apartments.

The civic team said between the 2nd and 23rd floors, elevations and entrance passages had been merged into flats. The 8th floor, marked as a refuge area, was found converted into a flat. From the 24th to 34th floors, the team reported that flats were amalgamated by demolishing partition walls. The lobby area was merged into apartments while parts of the kitchen area, elevation features and canopy were included in rooms. Toilet ducts were also found covered with RCC slabs. The area near the lift was covered and converted into a small room.

“Thakker Tower is not constructed as per approved plans and, in fact, has not complied with the mandatory compliance stipulated by the concerned authorities,” said the BMC’s report.

The builder said that “in the interest of justice”, the court should stay its order to clear the refuge area “till the time our proposal is sanctioned”. “We will shift the occupant of the refuge area to the new flat on the additional construction which we are going to put up,’’ it added. The developer also asked the court to protect the flat owner on the 8th floor, which is a refuge area.

In the meantime, the court stopped the BMC from acting against a first-floor resident after it was found that the space was originally meant for second stilt parking. Senior advocate Joaquim Reis, who represented the resident, said the BMC had granted part occupation certificate (OC) till the 14th floor. Hence, his client could not be thrown out because of the builder. “We took possession of the flat only after the BMC’s OC,” he said.

Last year, Willingdon Heights (also known as Thakker Tower) dragged the BMC and Brihanmumbai Electric Supply Undertaking (BEST) to court for “illegally” threatening to disconnect its electricity connection and charging it a much higher rate for power.

The dispute was over installing an electric sub-station on the building premises.
Refuge areas must at every 7th habitable floor: Rules L ast year, the state government laid down stringent provisions for fire fighting and to curb misuse of refuge areas in skyscrapers. The new rules stipulate that a refuge area will have to be provided at every seventh habitable floor after the first 24m of a high-rise.

“The refuge area shall be provided within building line at floor level. In case of high-rises with more than 30m height, the first refuge area shall be provided at 24m or first habitable floor, whichever is higher. Thereafter, the refuge area shall be provided at every seventh habitable floor,” the norms state.

The guidelines mention that a refuge area will now be restricted to just 4% of the habitable floor area it serves, and will be free of floor space index (FSI)—the ratio of permissible built-up area vis-à-vis the plot size. Refuge areas will be designated exclusively for the use of occupants “as temporary shelter and for the use of the fire brigade or any other organization dealing with emergencies and also for drills if conducted by the fire department”. TNN
Courtesy:
Nauzer K Bharucha TNN
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2013/06/21&PageLabel=1&EntityId=Ar00106&ViewMode=HTML

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

FSI Scam : State scraps prime mill land ‘largesse’ to builder


Former CM Ashok Chavan Had Given 7.6 FSI For Hotel

Mumbai: The state government has cancelled an abnormally high floor space index (FSI) of 7.6 sanctioned by former chief minister Ashok Chavan for a hotel project on the defunct Hindoostan Mills property at Prabhadevi. The government’s decision is a major setback for the developer, Hubtown (formerly known as Ackruti), which purchased this six-acre land jointly with construction giant DLF
for Rs 350 crore in 2007. It had planned to build a 60-storey hotel.

Chief minister Prithviraj Chavan is believed to have overturned his predecessor’s controversial decision last month. “He was livid when told that the National Textiles Corporation (NTC) had valued its own Indu Mills property at a phenomenal Rs 6,000 crore based on the largesse given to Hindoostan Mills,’’ said sources.

The state government was at that time negotiating with NTC to take over the 13.5-acre Indu Mills for an Ambedkar memorial. “The CM was intrigued at the reckless valuation done by NTC. There was no way the state government could pay such a large amount to NTC. It was then that the urban development department decided to revoke the high FSI sanctioned by Ashok Chavan,’’ said a senior bureaucrat.

The developer is now left with a much-reduced FSI of 1.33, which will allow only 3.5 lakh sq ft of permissible built-up area compared to the 15 lakh sq ft it had envisaged earlier. FSI defines how much can be built on a plot. For instance, a 7.6 FSI would allow a developer to build 7,600 sq m on a 1,000 sq m plot.

Other builders too sought higher FSI
Mumbai: Hubtown MD Vimal Shah was unavailable for comment, but sources said the developer will now set up a residential building on the Hindoostan Mill land. However, the plot falls under the coastal regulation zone 1 and is reserved only for industrial purposes.

Last year, TOI had reported that NRI tycoon C Sivasankaran had sold his 50% stake in Hindoostan Mills for almost Rs 450 crore. Hubtown and financial investor Red Fort Capital, who had the remaining stake, purchased Sivasankaran’s share. Sivasankaran had picked up DLF’s 50% stake in the property for Rs 310 crore in 2009.

Government sources said another reason why the Hindoostan Mills FSI had to be rejected was because other developers demanded similar concessions. “The owner of SoBo Central mall at Tardeo wanted more FSI to build a hotel, citing the Hindoostan Mills case,’’ said officials.

Officials said that some developers cunningly procured high FSI for hotels permitted under the 1967 development control rules (DCR), but simultaneously demanded building concessions allowed under the 1991 rules. Real estate sources said several developers procured much higher FSI under the garb of building a hotel and then slyly convert it into a “service apartment facility’’. “They then surreptitiously sell these apartments on long lease,’’ they said.

Meanwhile, the controversy over grant of hotel FSI has also stalled the redevelopment of the erstwhile Sea Rock Hotel at Bandra Bandstand. Last year, the 5.5 FSI project did not receive environmental clearance or approval under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification. The Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) raised queries about the project and refused to endorse it. The BMC too did not grant the project a commencement certificate. The Bombay high court too is hearing a PIL against the grant of such a high FSI to this project.

The Sea Rock project was earlier sanctioned an FSI of 2.5. However, in 2009, the then chief minister Ashok Chavan permitted additional FSI of 3.

THE PLOT 
In mid-2007, the Hindoostan Spinning and Weaving Mills (above), located near Siddhivinayak temple at Prabhadevi, was sold by its owner, the Thackerseys, for Rs 350 crore to Ackruti Nirman (now renamed Hubtown) and DLF. In 2009, NRI entrepreneur Sivasankaran picked up DLF’s 50% stake in the property for Rs 310 crore. Last year, he sold his stake for Rs 450 crore to Hubtown and financial investor Red Fort Capital.
Courtesy:
Nauzer K Bharucha TNN
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIM/2013/01/07&PageLabel=1&EntityId=Ar00100&ViewMode=HTML